Showing posts with label France. Show all posts
Showing posts with label France. Show all posts

Thursday, September 15, 2011

Stimulating cinema: Welcome

Director: Philippe Lioret
Year released: 2010

The folks at Film Movement are responsible for this one, along with a number of other gems--all of astonishingly high artistic value. The review below was written by Stephen Holden and published in the New York Times on May 7, 2010.

Philippe Lioret's compelling, finely balanced immigration drama, "Welcome," is set mostly in Calais, the port in northern France that is the closest French city to Britain. Here, where on a clear day the cliffs of Dover are visible like a glimpse of the promised land, is where Bilal (Firat Ayverdi), a 17-year-old Kurd, lands on a chilly, bleak February afternoon in 2008.

Having spent three months traveling on foot from Mosul, Iraq, during which he was captured and held prisoner for eight days by the Turkish Army, Bilal is a stubborn fool for love who hopes to cross the English Channel to be with his Kurdish sweetheart, Mina (Derya Ayverdi, Mr. Ayverdi’s sister). But he is persona non grata with her family, which has settled in London, where her father plans to marry her off to a prosperous cousin who owns grocery stores.

Like few other films about illegal immigration and its perils, “Welcome” puts you so completely into the shoes of a young man facing almost insurmountable obstacles that you feel a profound empathy not only for him but also for all who are ready to risk everything for the dream of a better life. Mr. Ayverdi’s portrayal of a shy innocent driven by blind faith in himself and ferocious stamina finds exactly the right spirit of determination tinged with petulance to make him entirely believable.

Because Bilal finds a reluctant, and unlikely, champion in Simon (Vincent Lindon), a middle-aged swimming instructor at a public pool in Calais, the movie has a lot in common with "The Visitor," which portrayed a similar relationship. But its story has a more organic feel and deeper emotional resonance. Granite-faced and baggy-eyed, his mouth set in a tight line, Mr. Lindon’s Simon epitomizes a solid, stoic Gallic masculinity in the mold of Jean Gabin.

When Bilal enters his life, Simon is in the midst of being amicably divorced from his wife, Marion (Audrey Dana), a schoolteacher who helps run an outdoor soup kitchen for the city’s 500 or so illegal immigrants. The spur to Simon’s unexpected patronage of Bilal is Marion’s accusation that he is indifferent not only to her but also to the plight of those less fortunate. Her stinging criticism wakes Simon up to his own self-absorption at exactly the moment when Bilal visits the pool where Simon works, seeking lessons so that he can swim the English Channel in a wet suit.

Bilal has already blown his best chance of crossing the water safely, having borrowed 500 euros to pay a “handler,” who in an early scene smuggles him and several others in the belly of a truck bound for a ferry to England. During the trip, which involves putting a plastic bag over his face at checkpoints to foil sensors programmed to detect human activity, he panics and gives the group away.

Because Simon and Marion were childless, Bilal, without Simon’s quite realizing it, becomes his surrogate son. The most dedicated pupil Simon has ever had, Bilal makes astonishingly rapid progress, and eventually Simon takes him to the water’s edge for practice.

One of the film’s achievements is to put you just as much in Simon’s shoes as in Bilal’s. Simon’s cynicism and sense of caution are constantly pulling him back and making him question his impulse to help the boy. Tiny misunderstandings can flare into lightning rages if Simon thinks Bilal might be playing him for a sucker. And Bilal, for all his sweetness, is no meek little angel. Below his litanies of humble thank yous is a will of iron, along with a streak of avarice.

In agreeing to help an illegal immigrant, Simon is breaking the law. His neighbors complain to the police and insinuate that Simon is sleeping with Bilal. If it can be proven that he is sheltering the boy, Simon faces arrest and possible incarceration. Even Marion, who is amazed at his change of heart, decides that he is going too far.

When Bilal eventually undertakes the solo journey, the movie shows you just how perilous it is. Aerial views reveal the currents Bilal will be fending off, while sea-level shots in the choppy gray water, in which vessels loom like predatory monsters bobbing in and out of view, make you feel like a fragile, shivering dot. The same sense of visceral immensity is conveyed by scenes of giant trucks lined up to make the ferry crossing at twilight.

As deeply as it explores the souls of Bilal and his wary protector, “Welcome” evokes a world of overwhelming forces, both natural and social, plying the waters of history. These forces may be resisted, but they will not be stopped.

Friday, July 22, 2011

Stimulating cinema: Le Ballon Rouge (The Red Balloon)

Director: Albert Lamorisse
Year: 1956

A picture is worth a thousand words.

So goes the old saying, and it's especially true of "The Red Balloon," another highly-honored film. The film is virtually dialogue free, there are maybe only six or seven lines in the whole movie (which is short by the way, around 33 minutes). But the lack of words merely adds to the wonder of Lamorisse's treasure.

I'm afraid I am not going to be able to do this one justice; it is simply that good. It's a fantasy film for children, filled with enough wonder and mystery to keep any adult glued to the screen to. The plot is simple, a young boy (Pascal Lamorrise, the director's son) on the way to school one morning finds a large, red balloon. He and the balloon quickly develop a close friendship and the two are rarely apart. The balloon seems to have a mind of its own though, and this is where the element of fantasy really kicks in. The balloon is really a character in its own right and through the direction and photography of the film almost seems like its "acting." The balloon practically conveys emotions like happiness and fear.

I'm normally not terribly interested in the behind-the-scenes stuff that goes into making a movie. I won't read lengthy articles on camera angles, shot composition and the science of lighting. I know those things are all hugely important, but I am mainly concerned with the finished article. However, in the case of "The Red Balloon," I would really be interested to know how the director was able to make the balloon appear as if it was acting and what kind of camera work (tricks?) was used when shooting the balloon. Especially the final moments of the film, I would really like to know how they pulled that off. Is there anyone reading this who can point me in the direction of a "making of" article on this one? (And as a purely frivolous side note, does anyone have any theories as to why the boy is the only one in the movie not wearing a coat in what is obviously chilly fall weather? This is bothering me a whole lot more than it should!)

Don't let the "children's movie" tag scare you off. "The Red Balloon" is for anyone who was ever young, for anyone who ever had a friend and for anyone who ever wanted a friend. And as near as I can tell, that's just about all of us. According to the Wikipedia entry for this movie, the Belleville section of Paris which served as the backdrop for this movie was razed to the ground during the late 1960s and virtually everything we see in the film (streets, businesses, neighborhoods) no longer exists. A shame, but fitting, because movies like this don't exist in the present day either.

Tuesday, June 14, 2011

Interview with Laurent Cantet

And finally, to give "The Class" the full treatment it deserves, we have an interview with director Laurent Cantet conducted in August of 2009 by Terry O'Keefe of The Hollywood Interview.

Director Laurent Cantet's The Class is no Dead Poet's Society/Mr. Holland's Opus/Stand and Deliver, and that's a good thing. Francois, the youngish teacher in the French junior high school depicted in the film, has an often unruly classroom of adolescents to manage, but he certainly doesn't have all of life's answers for them, or even for himself. Shot in a quasi-documentary fashion, loose and handheld, the truths of The Class come from its determination to avoid any sentiment or artifice, and to show life in the classroom as realistically as possible. The cast features real junior high school students and it's an immediate reminder that real 13-year olds don't look like the model types seen in Hollywood high school films. These kids are also socially awkward, and often irritating, and teaching them requires the patience of Job. Francois is played by co-screenwriter Francois Begaudeau, who was himself a teacher and wrote a best-selling autobiography entitled Entre les Murs (Between the Walls) about his experiences. Cantet worked with Begaudeau on the script for The Class, using the material from the book as a jumping-off point for the development of the eventual storyline.

The Class has arrived on DVD and Blu-ray this week with special features which include a Making of Featurette and commentaries on select scenes. We sat down with Laurent Cantet for our interview several months ago, in February, when he was visiting for the Oscars, and for which The Class was nominated in the Best Foreign Language Film category.

Terry Keefe: Was your reading of the book Entre les Murs the initial inspiration for making The Class, or were you seeking out a school-based story to adapt regardless and reading lots of potential material?

Laurent Cantet: In fact, I started to write a script, when I was not sure that I would be able to make my previous film [Heading South], and the story I wrote was – is still in the film, in fact, in the plotline of the film, which is the story of (the student character of) Souleymane. And it was like the book, just set between the walls of a sort of junior high school. But I stopped writing, because I finally managed to make my previous film, and the day of the release, I was invited to a talk show, in a radio talk show, and Francois, the writer of the book Entre les Murs, was here too, and he was here to speak of his book, and he read some excerpts of the book. He has been a teacher for ten years, and I realized that could bring me all this documentary material I really needed to make the film. And he also – it was obvious when you read the pages of his book – it was obvious that the dialogues and all that was happening in the book, had this energy I was trying to find for the film. So I proposed to him that we work together, not to make a real adaptation of the book, but just a sort of extension of it. To just take the different scenes that interested me in the book, and make them be a sort of departure point for the scenes of the film. Propose a scene to the class that we would form, and then see the way the children could react from that. And he was really interested in that. I don’t think he would have been interested in just another classical adaptation of his book. He would have had the feeling to do the same thing again, but here it was not doing the same thing. We were going to see the way these scenes…could resonate for other children. And so we worked together for quite a long time before shooting. We made a sort of workshop in the school, and Francois was here every Wednesday afternoon with me, and with the children. And he was just acting in front of them, and working with them. And we could write the film from three different things: From my first idea of the Souleymane story; from the book and the scene he proposed me; and from the way the children react to these scenes. And we put all that together – I don’t know exactly, even today I don’t remember what comes from the book, what comes from my previous idea, what comes from the children. Everything is mixed….

(Star and co-writer Francois Begaudeau, above)

Did you tape the rehearsals in the workshop as you were going along, so you could look at the material that you had?

Yes. We had a camera during all of the workshop – and in the French DVD, we have a sort of making-of which shows big parts of this workshop, and it’s quite interesting to see what they brought to the film, as in moments that they proposed in the improvisation that are in the film now.

Let’s talk about the editing process, which must have been daunting. You shot quite a bit of material that had to be pared down to feature length.

At the end, we had one hundred and fifty hours, and it was quite, how do you say, you could get lost in it [laughs] ?

How many editors did you have?

One.

One!

Yeah [laughs], and he (Robin Campillo) is also the co-writer of the film, so maybe he had a good idea what we were doing, you know.

Did you devise any type of charting system to keep track of all this diverse footage?

No, in fact we edited the film scene by scene. And we tried to get, to see everything before starting to edit each of the scenes, and we had in mind all the possibilities before editing. I’m sure that if we would have watched the rushes after editing, we would have changed a lot of things again. But, you know, at one moment, we said, “So, okay, it works this way,” but I think we could have made another editing which would have been very different.

You shot on HD. I assume you had a few cameras going at once?

Three cameras.

And did you have certain things planned out that each camera would cover, or did they just sort of float around?

One of them was always on the teacher. Because, you know, he’s the one who sort of organizes the scene and says to each student, “It’s up to you.” And the second camera was on the student who was speaking to the teacher. And the third one was preparing itself for the next one to speak, or trying to catch these little moments of the class life, you know? And all that makes, I think, the class feel real.


Production-wise, was there a challenge in making sure the multiple roaming cameras were never in the frame together?

No, in fact, that part was quite easy, because the room was square. And we changed it into a rectangle, and we kept two meters (free) for the cameras and for the technical stuff. And the three cameras are in the same side of the class, just like when you film a match, and you have always the teacher on the left, and the children on the right. It’s quite easy to understand who is watching whom.

How long was the casting process in terms of deciding which kids you were going to focus on?

Well, it was not real casting. In fact, we made this workshop in the school, it was open to all the volunteers of the school, who were aged between thirteen to fifteen. And, at the beginning, I think there were fifty of them who came, just to see what was happening in that workshop. And after a few weeks, twenty-five stayed, and they are the twenty-five who are in the film. I didn’t choose them – they decided to be part of the story, that’s all.

You’ve stayed in touch with the kids. Do you feel responsible for them to some degree now?

Yeah, but I’m very happy, because I was a little bit afraid of what would happen after Cannes, you know.

It’s potentially such an overwhelming new experience for them.

And also because the journalists tried to get them, tried to go with them on holiday, see them going back to their country, and we tried to protect them. But in fact, they stayed very calm about all that. None of them lost their mind. And what’s important for me was they always felt that the group was more important than themselves. And none of them tried to come to the front, you know, and I think it’s – the film has been done in a very democratic way, and I think they understood that very well, and went on in that way of behaving afterwards.

Do any of them plan to pursue acting further?

Some of them would like to play again, to act again. One of them already made another film last summer, but they are still in school, and they still study, and, you know, they don’t lose their mind at all.


In the United States, the story of a teacher and his students is almost a genre in itself. There have been a lot of films based around this dynamic, and they’re often very sentimental. Did you make a conscious decision to veer away from sentiment?

That was one point. The other point was that I didn’t want to create this “perfect teacher,” that would take the children from a very bad position, to – how do you say it - inspirational? I tried to show a teacher that just tries to do his best, and sometimes makes mistakes, sometimes misses his purpose, you know? And I think it’s much closer to the school reality than an inspirational teacher that would be sort, of a maitre a penser, a thinking master, or something like that. And I think that’s the main difference between American school/class films and all that, and this one. I think this film is asking a lot of questions about school, about what it means to learn something, what it means to teach something. But it doesn’t give a lot of answers, because I think that the situation is too complex to have any specific answers – especially in two hours, when you’re making a film, you don’t have time to analyze everything, so you just – I just try to show the complexity of the system.

How influenced have you been by the neorealists?

Well, I think my favorite director would be Roberto Rossellini. I like the way he looks at the reality without being afraid of emotions in the same time. He’s even sometimes melodramatic. And I think that’s what I always try to make in my films: show the reality through the experience of people, and if you really look at people living the situation, you often go to the emotion that they feel about the reality.


The film has a strong fly-on-the wall feel, much like a real slice-of-life documentary, but there is a subtle guiding hand of narrative underneath. It's a tough balance to pull off, I imagine.

I, in fact, have a fictional line, and I like to develop it in a context that really looks like reality. And even if this reality is always rebuilt, it’s not a documentary in the sense that you just put your camera and wait until the things happen in front of the camera. Here, especially for this film, we created the class by putting together children who are in the same school but didn’t know each other very well, and we created characters with each of them. They were allowed to improvise on the scene, but also I gave them very precise lines that I really needed to hear in the film, and that they were able to introduce in the improvisation, just like it was coming from them. And most of them are very different in the film than what they are in real life. The main character, Souleymane, was a tough guy, you know, who has problem with the system, but he’s one of the most quiet boys I ever met, and he’s very discreet, and he’s even a little bit shy. But he likes acting, and I saw that on the first day we met, and I was so happy to try to find a character to try to act a different way he would act, he would be himself. It was very interesting for me to work with him.

Were you shooting hand-held most of the time?

It was all on the shoulder – and, you know, the first shot of each scene was very long, it was twenty-five minutes long. And then, after the first take, I would speak with each of the children, telling them, “That was interesting, you will keep that, you can avoid that, you can forget that, you could say that later – when you will say that…” and we were rebuilding the scene through what they proposed, but quite close to what I was expecting, in fact.

How long did it take for the kids to stop noticing the camera?

That was not a problem at any moment. Maybe because they are part of the generation that is very used to this, or just because, you know, after a while, when you let them think about what they are doing, they forgot they are not in a real lesson, and they are just acting, without thinking. And the other thing is, with three cameras, they never know when they are filmed, but they can be filmed at any moment – so they are acting from the action to the cut.

Did you learn anything about being a kid that’s different now, from when you were one?

What I learned is that, you know, we have a very bad image of kids now – they are supposed to be idiots, just able to play video games, and what they proved to me is if you give a certain meaning to what they are doing, a sense, I don’t know how you say that, they can give you much more than what you can expect at the beginning. And they were able to stay concentrated on the work, for a six-hour day. And the teachers who are in the film are also the real teachers of these kids in the same school, and they were so jealous to see that we were able to keep them like that – in a room and just working for six hours!

Do you know what you’re working on next?

No. For the moment I am just traveling with this film, which will soon finish, so I will have to think to the next film. And I need to go back to work now, but it’s too early, and I really need to finish this story before starting another one. The only think I’m sure of is that the working method I found for this film will be the one I will use again on my next one.

It’s hard to imagine the production process of this pre-digital. I’m envisioning several Moviola editing decks covered with hundreds of trims.

Yeah, and HD really…it gives the film freedom that I never had before, and I think you can see it when you watch the film. And, you know, since we had three cameras, we didn’t have to cut and make the reverse shot, and so it respects all the energy of the scene, and I think it’s the only way now for me to work. I think the freedom I’ve found with this film is what I will want on the next one. Because it allows you to really listen to what people have to say, and just let the camera roll, and then see sometimes you have ten minutes where nothing is happening – and then after ten minutes you have one scene that is so perfect.

Reviews: The Class

Here are two reviews of "The Class," written by Cosmo Landesman in the Sunday (London) Times and Philip French in The Guardian.

In the week when University Challenge gave us a new brain of Britain, Gail Trimble, to admire,along comes The Class, a realistic look at life in a rough, multicultural secondary school in Paris that challenges the pedagogic assumptions that produced Trimble and other successful students of the classics. It’s a film that starts with the hope of a new term and ends a year later with the sad admission of failure. “I learnt nothing this year,” says a young black student.

Stylistically, The Class is a curious hybrid. Directed by Laurent Cantet, it is based on a book by François Bégaudeau about his time as a teacher. Cantet workshopped the piece with non-professional teenagers, and actual teachers and parents, to produce a docu-like drama, with Bégaudeau as a fictional version of himself. And the performances from the non-actors are quite remarkable. But, please, sir, may I ask a question? Just as photography made a kind of naturalistic painting redundant, hasn’t reality television made reality-based fiction redundant too? Why fake a fly-on-the-wall style when you can shoot a fly-on-the-wall documentary that will be as good as any drama?

Still, there’s no denying The Class is a distinguished work that breaks with the traditions of the pedagogic pic. This is no uplifting tale of an idealistic teacher who, through sheer perseverance, finally reaches his disruptive class and shows them the wonders of knowledge and the joys of learning. It’s a dispatch from the front line of any urban school in western Europe.

We first see Monsieur Marin (Bégaudeau) sipping coffee, as if bracing himself to face another year. Once inside the classroom, we can see why: his is a daily struggle to keep his 14- and 15-year-olds calm, quiet and interested enough to be taught. He handles this unruly lot with a mix of encouragement, exasperation, Socratic probing and gentle sarcasm. Marin is neither a stuffy traditionalist nor a down-with-the-kids trendy. He believes in discipline and classroom etiquette, but wants his pupils to feel free to speak their mind. This can be problematic, as when one of his pupils, Souleymane (Franck Keïta), duly speaks his mind and asks him if it is true that he is gay.

What the film captures better than any other school film is the everyday reality — the social dynamics and cultural conflicts — of the modern classroom. Marin’s students constantly disrupt the learning process with questions that throw him off track. Two of his mouthiest malcontents are Khoumba (Rachel Régulier) and her sidekick, Esméralda (Esméralda Ouertani). They are mini-monsters, smart when it comes to pushing a teacher’s buttons. They ask for definitions of words; they question the raison d’être for elements of grammar; and, most of all, they challenge his sense of himself as culturally sensitive.

They want to know why, when giving examples, he always uses white names such as Bill, instead of African or Arab names. His self-evidently inadequate reply that going down that route “would never end” suggests he is the one with the closed mind.

The film takes its time to build up the drama, preferring a slow accumulation of small conflicts and incidents. Cantet wants us to see the good, bad and ugly sides of the classroom, and creates a constant dramatic tension between the didactic and the disruptive. He knows these kids can drive their teachers nuts or explode in anger at any point. It’s a fascinating study of how a dedicated teacher’s character — his ability to stay cool in the face of routine provocation — is challenged every time he enters the classroom.

The film raises important questions about learning, authority and discipline, and is honest enough to admit that it doesn’t really have any answers. The trouble is, it seems to think there’s plenty of real learning going on somewhere in that room. But Marin’s class is like a large therapy session in which the kids can learn about themselves. This becomes most obvious when they are given The Diary of Anne Frank to read — not as part of their Holocaust studies, but to inspire them to pen self-portraits.

The Class likes to think it moves from the observational to the dramatic without interposing moral judgments or taking sides. Clearly, it doesn’t want to be one of those scary Hollywood flicks about the horrors of the urban school. Yet it offers a more frightening look at modern education than anything Hollywood cooks up. If you think the plus side of what goes on here outweighs the negative, ask yourself: would you want your child to be in this class? Of course not. Now, here’s the really scary and depressing part: many of our children are already in classes like this one.


Laurent Cantet emerged on the world scene as a French director in the Ken Loach tradition with his first feature, Human Resources, in 2000. Using a non-professional cast, it dealt with matters of class and industrial relations through the story of a high-flying academic coming as a business trainee to a provincial factory where his middle-aged father works on the production line.

His second film, Time Out (2001), centred on a middle-rank executive who can't bring himself to tell his family he's been made redundant. His next film, Heading South (2005), took him in a slightly different direction and used three prominent actresses to play well-heeled American women visiting Haiti as sex tourists. Again, the themes were deception, self-deception and the confrontation of difficult truths.

For his fourth feature, The Class, which won the Palme d'Or at Cannes last year, he's reverted to a non-professional cast in adapting Entre les murs, a novel by François Bégaudeau. Like writers as varied as Evelyn Waugh (Decline and Fall) and Evan Hunter (The Blackboard Jungle), Bégaudeau has turned his teaching experiences into fiction and he himself plays a "prof" at a tough, racially mixed, inner-city school in Paris. There's a remarkable French tradition of school films, extending from Jean Vigo's Zéro de conduite to Nicolas Philibert's Etre et avoir. Cantet, whose parents were both teachers, carries it on and he elicits marvellous performances from a cast who are, we're assured, not merely playing versions of themselves.

The film covers an academic year, beginning with the teachers gathering for the autumn term, introducing themselves to each other and being welcomed by the principal, an unsmiling figure wearing rimless glasses. It ends with an informal soccer match between staff and pupils and a long-held shot of an empty classroom, its blackboard pristine once more.

The camera never leaves the school. We just see the staff room, the claustrophobic playground (rather like a prison exercise yard), the principal's office, a conference room, and the classroom where François Marin (Bégaudeau) is form tutor and teaches French to a mixed group of 14- and 15-year-olds. We're shown nothing of the homes of staff and pupils and we never see what the school offers by way of a library, laboratories or sports facilities.

In a taut, hand-held, documentary-style fashion, the film concentrates on Marin as he tries to keep order in the class, mediating between conflicting ethnic groups, damping down the irreverently vociferous, bringing out the reticent and trying to educate them. How in God's name, many will think, can a teacher continue day after day in this brutal theatre of apathy and aggression? At one point, a new teacher comes into the staff room on the point of a breakdown, complaining about the impossibility of doing anything with these "animals". A colleague takes him outside for a "breath of fresh air", which seems to do the trick.

Marin's class is not an immediately endearing collection. They're querulous and quarrelsome and in some ways the brightest are the most disruptive and obstreperous. When he teaches them the complexities and subtleties of French verbs and tenses, they challenge the need to know such things. People don't talk like that, they say, which is amusing in a depressing way. He gives them The Diary of Anne Frank to study as a prelude to understanding and expressing themselves by writing self-portraits. But none of them bothers to read it and one of the smartest pupils, the near-nihilistic Tunisian teenager Esmeralda, says she can't be bothered with books. But Marin persists and they all end up writing something revealing and then visit the computer room to turn the texts into attractively produced folders.

Marin's big success comes when he gets the withdrawn, unco-operative, inarticulate Souleymane, a tall, handsome pupil from Mali, to develop his gift for photography and make his self-portrait a fully illustrated family history. But Souleymane also becomes his biggest failure when he's taken to the principal's office for the second time after a confused act of violence in class. Will the result be expulsion and his possible return to a village in Mali? This provides an involving vein of suspense that runs through the second half of the film.

We learn nothing of Marin's life outside the classroom other than his claim - when challenged by a confused, homophobic pupil during a classroom discussion - that he isn't gay. In this non-judgmental film, the audience is left to do the judging and the film is certainly a testing experience for someone of my generation reared in schools where strict decorum and severe discipline were the unvarying norm.

Neither weary cynic nor wide-eyed idealistic, Marin is a decent, determined realist, a Sisyphus of the schoolroom, pushing his boulder up the hill every day and occasionally getting to stay at the top overnight. He isn't one of those triumphalist Hollywood heroes who inspires a class of unruly Hispanic maths pupils from the barrio to get maths scholarships to UCLA and MIT, or persuades a generation of special students to worship dead poets. He tries to understand the boys and girls and when the parents visit him to discuss their children's progress we begin to understand with him the range of homes from which they come.

At one point, Marin loses his rag and calls the provocative Esmeralda and her collusive friend "pétasses", a term the Larousse Dictionnaire de l'argot defines as "femme vulgaire; prostituée debútante ou occasionnelle", and which the subtitles translate as "skank". The girls play up this insult for all its worth. They launch a vindictive campaign to destroy him and foolishly he engages them in the playground, provoking a second slanging match.

Fortunately, the matter is more intelligently dealt with than a similar incident in a BBC green room might have been. Marin is not a saint, though by the end of the school year he has exhibited certain of the necessary qualities.

Stimulating cinema: The Class (originally 'Entre le Murs' or 'Between the Walls')

Director: Laurent Cantet
Year released: 2008

Ah, high school. The Goth kid who claims to dress "differently" as a matter of self-expression, yet who looks like every other Goth kid around the world. The Asian kid whose good at math. The bored girls who need every ounce of energy to get their voices to a whisper. The kid of ambiguous sexuality. The roughnecks in the back who never crack a book and don't take off their caps until the teacher orders them to do so. The wise-guys (and girls) who will do or say anything just to get a laugh or to wind up the teacher. You were one of these kids, I was too. And that's part of what makes this movie so amazing and such an enjoyable treat.

Seen through the distance of time, we are able to recognize these kids for what they are--adolescents struggling to find their own voice through whatever means they can. They may act out; they may withdraw. But whatever they do we, as adults, have to remember that they are just kids and will do kid things. It is important for us (up to a point of course, nobody should be made a fool of) to try and reach these kids, try and understand them. The hero of this movie Mr. Marin (Francois Begeaudeau who wrote the book on his real-life experiences that this movie was based on and is essentially playing himself) gets this. Some of his colleagues don't. And even when it would perhaps be the smarter thing for Marin to cut his losses with a particular student, he doesn't He demands respect yes. But he also goes to back for his kids, tries to assess their performances honestly and fairly and hands out praise wherever and whenever it's due.

It's perplexing to me how posters on sites like imdb question Begeaudeau's teaching methods. The odds are stacked against him--the kids are, for the most part, either sullen or argumentative. They don't do their assignments and they act up--a lot. They talk back. Begeaudeau tries to reach them anyway he can--cajoling, mocking, scoffing, prodding, sometimes even condescending. But the bottom line is he cares. And these are hard cases. One girl, Khoumba, serves as a stark example. As the year opens, she is friendly and largely respectful to her teacher. Smart-mouthed sure, but nothing over the top and frequently she raises good points. However, her mood changes abruptly to the point where she flat-out refuses to do anything asked of her which prompts a showdown between her and Begeaudeau. Nothing is really resolved; Khoumba doesn't mean her apology and Begeaudeau has failed to reach her. Yet by the time the spring arrives, the two are more or less on the same page again. What happened to prompt Khoumba's change? Who knows? She alludes to "not acting like a kid anymore," which could mean there was some traumatic upheaval in her life (a death? a pregnancy?). But maybe it's nothing more than just having a bad day. Begeaudeau, though, cares enough to try and reach her.

Many of the children are from immigrant families (Algerians, Moroccans, Malians, Chinese) and it's doubtful how much parental involvement there is. Of course, part of this is because of the language barrier--the children know French but not the parents. And this is how the hardest case in the class, a boy from Mali named Souleymane, has managed to convince his mother that he studies hard and does his homework without fail when the reality is 180 degrees opposite. In the most powerful scene in the film, Begeaudeau accuses the two class representatives of behaving like "skanks" for laughing it up during a teachers' meeting. Souleymane uses this as an opportunity to act out his frustrations, under the guise of defending his classmates' honor. This inadvertently touches off a fracas that leads to Khoumba getting her face bloodied and Souleymane facing a disciplinary panel that will determine whether or not he will be expelled. It's a little worse for him than that; his father will likely send him back to Mali if he gets expelled ("you don't know Souleymane's dad") so his whole future in France (presumably a better world) hangs in the balance.

There are so many talking points that come out of this movie. What are the limits of tolerance within a school? How far is too far when we are talking about a student's behavior? And then there are the simmering tensions between the students themselves. As a soccer fan, I completely enjoyed the scenes where students were asked to give speeches defending some point of view. A Moroccan boy alerts his classmates to the fact that the African Cup of Nations is soon starting and happily points out that--just in case you didn't know--Morocco beat Mali, 4-0, the last time the teams played and that Mali will now be watching the tournament on the sideline. So another Malian boy leaps into the fray, jumping on the Ivory Coast bandwagon as the representative team of black Africa. Then a student of Caribbean descent points out how the French national team has been historically aided by players from Guadeloupe. It is spellbinding stuff--mixing sport, culture and politics and it's the kind of thing I just can't get enough of.

This movie has rightly received many honors--it is flat-out brilliant. It's important to realize that these are not actors but real-life teachers and students which lends immediacy and authenticity to the picture. The movie also has a tremendous "fly-on-the-wall" quality, allowing us to see inside the classroom and empathize with the characters. This is really, really good stuff and I would definitely be interested in seeing a follow-up say 10 years down the road so that we can see what's become of Begeaudeau and his charges.

Wednesday, June 8, 2011

Stiumlating cinema: Man on Wire

Director: James Marsh
Year released: 2008

I used to have a great fear of heights. I say "used to," that's not entirely true because I sat through this movie with my heart pounding and my palms sweating. And obviously, there was no reason to be scared. This movie has a happy ending and it's not giving anything away when I say that Philippe Petit successfully completed his wire walk between the towers of the World Trade Center. Heck, there's his picture right on the cover of the DVD doing just that. Nevertheless, I was scared watching this--the same way I would be on a roller coaster. It was a good scare, exhilarating and thrilling. And that's the genius of this movie, which deservedly has earned a slew of awards. Even though the outcome is known beforehand, the journey that gets you there is so amazing, so impossible, so emotional, that you can't help but be swept away.

Petit is a real character. Even now (I would guess he's in his late 50s or early 60s), he is seen is a ball of barely restrained energy. He speaks passionately about everything from the art of wire walking to the most mundane details of the story. There is nothing dull about Petit and his energy dominates the proceedings. We see childhood pictures of Petit, in a split-screen side by side with clips of the World Trade Center being constructed. It's as if this two forces were destined to meet one day (Petit's telling of the first time he saw a drawing of the towers while reading a newspaper in the dentist's office as a young man is one of the film's many highlight scenes). Petit also makes what, for me, was a fascinating point. Often times, if someone has a dream it is something tangible, something definite that they can point to that exists (wanting to go to Hawaii say, or wanting to be a doctor). Hawaii and doctors exist. But in the early stages, Petit's dream DIDN'T exist in a physical form. It's like he had the idea of wanting to do something spectacular but the venue wasn't in place yet. He had to show remarkable patience just to get to the verge of realizing his dream.

Petit warmed up for his tower walk with a couple of other audacious stunts--walking across the the towers of Notre Dame Cathedral in Paris and crossing the Bay Bridge in Sydney. To me, these were mind-blowing but child's play considering what lay ahead. The archival footage of these walks is fascinating to see, along with the old photos and the recollections of Petit and his friends.
Gradually, the WTC plan begins taking shape. Petit has a willing group of helpers on his team and their recollections are also vital to the success of the movie. It helps balance the hyper-kinetic Petit to have some other points of view coming in so often. I found it interesting that although the key players are all in their (again) late 50s or early 60s (I would guess), the look darn good! Maybe it's something about capers that keeps you young. Or maybe their association with Petit was like a fountain of youth by proxy.

Petit spent a ton of time "spying" on the towers. He and his associates at one point posed as journalists to go up to the top and interview workers, while surreptitiously taking pictures and making notes. Of course, Petit meant no harm, but in watching these scenes, I couldn't help but think how other people with more malicious intents would have been doing exactly the same thing in the months and years leading up to 9-11. It's really eerie and unsettling to think about just how easy this was done and how vulnerable the towers were in retrospect.

This movie has it all. Like many reviewers have noted, it's structured like a heist film and the suspense is really something (although, like I mentioned above, the outcome is already known). Petit and the others are thoughtful, sensitive, often very witty and funny and seem like good people. And in the end, the majesty of Petit's walk really hits home. A couple of his friends really get overwhelmed talking about it even now and I can understanding. It is something to behold--they really did manage to do the impossible. Think about this--out of the 6 billion or so people on our planet, there is one, just one, person who has walked on a wire between the two towers of the World Trade Center. And obviously, no one will again. How many people can say that? That, truly is, the essence of living and something the vast majority of us will only know through great movies like this one.